PolicySandbox.ai

Reference scenario

RBA cash rate up from 3.85 to 4.50, simulated over two years. Run live on every page load - engine 1.0.0, 250 Monte Carlo draws.

Demo simulation - not an official forecast. The baseline economy is dimensionally correct and in the right neighbourhood of published Australian aggregates, but it is not an official extract. Every relationship is calibrated rather than estimated by this project. Results are scenario estimates, not predictions.

Prosperity Index

58.4

0.01 pts

Broad-based material living standards

Modelled Wellbeing

58.5

0.68 pts

Security and material proxies, not happiness

CPI

2.64%

0.06pp

from 2.70% at baseline

Unemployment rate

4.32%

0.12pp

from 4.20% at baseline

Prosperity Index

Broad-based material living standards at two years. A weighted composite whose weights are a value judgement, not a finding.

58.4

0.01 points

from 58.4 at baseline

Who the movement reached

  • 826k households better off
  • 4.9m households broadly unchanged
  • 5.5m households worse off

The share of households the microsimulation puts on each side. It is shown beside the index rather than inside it, because averaging a gain across people who did not receive it is how a composite hides who paid for it.

What moved it - contributions sum exactly to 0.01 points

The right-hand column is each component’s weight. Contributions are exact rather than apportioned - the index aggregates its components with no lag, so these add up to the total by construction.

Headline indicators

Every variable the engine flags as headline, with its uncertainty band and confidence class. Each card opens its full derivation in the workspace.

Mortgage repayment

$4,461

+4.9%vs $4,254 baseline
$4,401 – $4,516High

House prices

$885k

−4.0%vs $922k baseline
$867k – $896kMedium

Dwelling approvals

178k

−3.6%vs 185k baseline
176k – 180kHigh

Budget balance

-$29.9bn

−$1.9bnvs -$28.0bn baseline
-$30.5bn – -$29.3bnHigh

Financial stress index

47.5

+1.5 ptsvs 46.0 baseline
45.8 – 49.6Low

Cash rate

4.49%

+0.64ppvs 3.85% baseline
4.48% – 4.50%High

Wellbeing

58.6

−0.6 ptsvs 59.2 baseline
57.9 – 59.0Low

Mortgage rate

6.60%

+0.55ppvs 6.05% baseline
6.51% – 6.70%High

GDP

$2.65tn

−0.51%vs $2.66tn baseline
$2.64tn – $2.65tnMedium

Disposable income

$1.71tn

+0.35%vs $1.70tn baseline
$1.70tn – $1.71tnHigh

Rents

$719

+0.35%vs $717 baseline
$718 – $721Medium

Consumer spending

$1.72tn

−0.31%vs $1.73tn baseline
$1.72tn – $1.73tnHigh

Unemployment rate

4.32%

+0.12ppvs 4.20% baseline
4.27% – 4.39%High

CPI

2.64%

−0.06ppvs 2.70% baseline
2.58% – 2.68%High

Wage growth

3.27%

−0.03ppvs 3.30% baseline
3.25% – 3.29%High

Prosperity

58.4

+0.0 ptsvs 58.4 baseline
58.0 – 58.8Low

Population

28.55m

−0.00%vs 28.55m baseline
28.55m – 28.55mHigh

Migration

260k

0.00%vs 260k baseline
No uncertainty bandHigh

How it arrives

Scenario against baseline, with the P10 to P90 band from 250 Monte Carlo draws over coefficient uncertainty.

Average mortgage repayment

Shaded band: P10–P90
  • Scenario
  • Baseline path

House prices

Shaded band: P10–P90
  • Scenario
  • Baseline path

Rents

Shaded band: P10–P90
  • Scenario
  • Baseline path

Inflation

Shaded band: P10–P90
  • Scenario
  • Baseline path

Unemployment rate

Shaded band: P10–P90
  • Scenario
  • Baseline path

Real disposable income

Shaded band: P10–P90
  • Scenario
  • Baseline path

Who it lands on

A national average is the least informative view of a policy. These are the same result, disaggregated.

The whole population

Every modelled household on one bar, so the headline average is never read without knowing how many it reached.

  • 7.4%826k households better off
  • 43.6%4.9m households broadly unchanged
  • 49.0%5.5m households worse off

Who gains and who pays

Change in monthly disposable cash by household group, at the reporting horizon.

By age

Monthly disposable cash by age bracket. Depth of colour is the size of the effect.

By state

A composite of housing, employment and construction exposure. Directional only - the model has no suburb-level detail.

When it lands

Effects do not arrive together. Each marker sits at the month that effect becomes material.

now
RBA cash rate and 2 more begin to move
3mo
Financial stress index and 2 more begin to move
6mo
House prices and 2 more begin to move
12mo
Budget balance and 2 more begin to move
24mo
Underemployment rate and 2 more begin to move

Scored across ten dimensions

Each dimension anchored so that unchanged is unchanged. The total is an average and is not plotted, because averaging a trade-off is how you lose it.

Policy scorecard

Movement from unchanged on each of ten dimensions. The total is an average and is deliberately not plotted - a policy that scores well by trading housing against employment is a different object from one that improves both.

50 = unchanged

What the engine says about it

Executive summary

Written by the deterministic narrator from the computed result - the same text with or without an API key.

Under the selected assumptions, RBA cash rate up from 3.85 to 4.50 produces the following over 2 years. Budget balance falls by $1.9bn; RBA cash rate rises by 0.64pp; Average outstanding mortgage rate rises by 0.55pp; Average mortgage repayment rises by 4.9%; House prices falls by 4.0%. On the household side, roughly 826k households end up better off in cash terms and 5.5m households worse off, with the remainder largely unaffected. The Modelled Wellbeing Index - a weighted composite of material and security proxies, not a measure of happiness - moves -0.68 points to 58.5.

In the first six months, RBA cash rate rises to +0.65pp; Average outstanding mortgage rate rises to +0.05pp; Average mortgage repayment rises to +0.10%. Then Financial stress index rises to +0.3 pts; First home buyer access falls to −0.2 pts; Investor demand falls to −0.09%. Then House prices falls to −0.18%; Price to income ratio falls to −0.18%; Inflation falls to −0.02pp. Transmission is fastest where a price is administered - interest rates, excise, subsidy rates - and slowest where behaviour has to change.

Between six months and two years, Budget balance falls to −$302.6m; Dwelling approvals falls to −0.70%; Job vacancies falls to −0.55%. Then Underemployment rate rises to +0.23pp; Unemployment rate rises to +0.12pp; Modelled Wellbeing Index falls to −0.6 pts.

The averages hide the distribution. recent buyers with large mortgages lose about $191 a month, while established mortgage holders lose about $152 a month. Meanwhile outright owners approaching retirement gain about $43 a month, and retirees with savings gain about $34 a month. That gap - not the aggregate - is usually what determines whether a policy survives contact with the public.

Two forces work against the headline result. Construction capacity loop: Trying to build more bids up the cost of building, which chokes off part of the increase. The reason a large approvals target delivers less than it promises. Housing supply loop: Higher prices induce building, which adds to the stock, which eventually lowers prices. The loop is real but extremely slow - the dwelling stock moves about 1.5% a year.

Start from a question

Pre-built scenarios covering the levers most often debated.

PolicySandbox.ai provides scenario modelling and research tools. Results are estimates based on models, assumptions and available data, and should not be interpreted as guaranteed forecasts or as financial, legal, medical or government advice.